New: pathway guides, toolkits and state profiles for seven states. Parts are still being confirmed with agencies and reviewers, and we update them as answers arrive. Learn more

Cookbook, not personal chef

Explore → Plan → Pilot → Scale

Every district that built career-connected learning well walked these four stages. Every district that stalled skipped one. Each stage below has its core work, its key decisions, and — most important — its exit criteria: how you know you're ready for the next stage rather than just eager.

Two doors in — one path

Choose your entry point

Entry point one · Start this year

The Plug-In Start

Begin inside the school you already run: roughly an hour a week of structured career-connected experience — employer-partnered projects, rotating workplace learning, a career-connected advisory block — expandable each semester. No new building, no master-schedule war, no board fight. What it buys you: proof, partnerships, and appetite. What it can't do: change what school is.

Entry point two · The Winchester door

The Immersion Redesign

Career-connected learning as a universal graduation experience — every student, career and academic coursework together, employers and postsecondary partners as co-owners. What it buys you: coherence, equity by design, and a changed institution. What it demands: the full four stages, a real capital strategy, and a community that has moved from whether to how.

Most districts enter Plug-In and walk toward Immersion. Both doors open onto the same path.

The four stages

Click a stage for its work, decisions, and exit criteria

Stage 1 — Explore (typically 3–6 months)

The work

Assemble a broad stakeholder team — leaders, teachers, counselors, employers, postsecondary, families, students. Read your labor market honestly: growth sectors, wage floors, real openings. See working models — site visits, or a Multiple Choice screening as the community’s shared reference point. Surface the community’s actual appetite.

Key decisions

Is there a real regional demand signal? Who owns this work internally?

Exit criteria

A named team, a written demand case, and leadership publicly committed to planning — not to a program yet, to planning.

Stage 2 — Plan (typically 6–12 months)

The work

Run the District Readiness Assessment across the six capacity domains. Choose your structural model (immersive / embedded / extended) and your entry point. Map the policy machinery: credit integration vs. substitution, graduation requirements, your state’s levers. Convert employer goodwill into signed MOUs. Draft the braided budget — launch and recurring.

Key decisions

Which model, which career fields (matched to demand), which credit mechanism, which anchor partners.

Exit criteria

A readiness reading of “Ready for a Pilot” or better; a written program design; at least one anchor employer or postsecondary MOU; board awareness turning into board support.

Stage 3 — Pilot (a school year)

The work

Start deliberately small — one cohort, one pathway, one “pocket academy.” Charter it like an experiment: named KPIs including an explicit equity metric, leading indicators tracked from day one, and feedback loops with students, employers, and teachers. Protect the pilot from schedule and staffing improvisation — its job is to prove the system, not to survive on heroics.

Key decisions

What must be true by spring to justify scaling? What’s the kill / fix / scale threshold?

Exit criteria

KPI evidence reviewed against the charter; employer partners renewing unprompted; a documented model others in the district could run without the founding team.

Stage 4 — Scale (2–5 years)

The work

Move from program to system: a staffing pipeline (alternative certification, industry recruits, co-teaching pairs), formalized employer governance, braided funding made structural, additional pathways added against demand data, and the evaluation spine extended. The universal-access decision lives here: is career-connected learning a thing your district does, or the way it does school?

Key decisions

Scale wide (more pathways) or deep (more intensity)? When does the board codify it in policy and budget — not initiative funding?

Exit criteria

It survives leadership turnover. That’s the test.